« Back to Summary
What other features should we leave out of Firestorm?
#Response DateResponse Text
1Jun 28, 2011 5:51 AMOn the radar, the time that someone is there is a non-feature to me. Also, being able to shift the columns around would be very handy
2Jun 28, 2011 4:21 AMCrashing!
3Jun 28, 2011 4:12 AMOld v1-style "Contacts" list.
4Jun 28, 2011 3:15 AMNone I can think of that wasn't already mentioned.
5Jun 28, 2011 1:39 AMi am all for as much usability as i can, some ppl my not like the allwase fly opthion but plain and simple it makes admin work on my own non fly sims easer, and some sims are far too crowded and hard to walk in espechaly whin thay have no fly on, it has allowed me to be a part of sims that i would otherwise avoid completly and one of the primary reasons i cerrently use phoenix above any other third party aplacathion, if firestrom has it i will defanently be intrested, if not well then i think i might be staying with phoenix.
6Jun 28, 2011 12:21 AMplease stop to add these "paranoia" features known form emerald viewer
7Jun 28, 2011 12:10 AMno thoughts on this - anything that compromises privacy. users must have privacy or they won't be happy. serious and experienced users in particular (like moi, 2006) won't dig it.
8Jun 27, 2011 11:08 PMIt's good the way it is
9Jun 27, 2011 10:01 PMNothing should be left out of Firmstorm that is in Phoenix right now, You should be able to just convert the viewers over with a little bit of programming work I am sure.
10Jun 27, 2011 9:55 PMNo ratings with stars!
11Jun 27, 2011 9:44 PMUnsure yet.
12Jun 27, 2011 9:33 PMnone. i love Phoenix as it is and would prefer every feature transfer
13Jun 27, 2011 9:13 PManything that goes against the TOS...outside of that, nothing comes to mind.
14Jun 27, 2011 8:11 PMnone
15Jun 27, 2011 7:48 PMThe Firestorm color scheme
16Jun 27, 2011 7:01 PMAnything that would violate the personal privacy of others.
17Jun 27, 2011 6:37 PMNone! Don't leave out features just because a few people don't like them.
18Jun 27, 2011 6:22 PMleave out features that take users privacy away, even if it benefits other users.
19Jun 27, 2011 4:15 PMfeatures that violate various country's privacy laws. (Aka online status)
20Jun 27, 2011 4:00 PMnothing.. i hate seeing features go.. then all you are is Viewer 2 with a different face lift.
21Jun 27, 2011 3:51 PMNothing I can think of.
22Jun 27, 2011 3:33 PMThe new UI please!!!
23Jun 27, 2011 3:32 PMI'll let you know if I find them!
24Jun 27, 2011 2:26 PMI would really love to have my IMs alerts back to my local chat window and notices show up as they used to in V1, those little iccons in the right corner make it really easy to miss important IMs and notices.
25Jun 27, 2011 2:20 PMRestore the old bridge without XML crap and http communication.
26Jun 27, 2011 1:38 PMRadar should NOT show me to someone if I have chosen to "show offline". Breaching this is like letting people look through my front window.
27Jun 27, 2011 1:21 PMThe V2 UI.
28Jun 27, 2011 1:15 PMnone
29Jun 27, 2011 12:55 PMNone of the ones available in Phoenix, possibly.
30Jun 27, 2011 12:31 PMnone.
31Jun 27, 2011 12:10 PMnone i can think of
32Jun 27, 2011 10:51 AMNot sure about this. I think i can grow to like the firestorm viewer, however, it is going to take a while to become familiar with it. perhaps you could do a couple more surveys, one in one month and then at 3 and 6 month intervals and the users will be more familiar wth it. of course you are going to add mesh support at some point, correct?
33Jun 27, 2011 10:50 AMMesh primarily needed to be setup in the viewer for future development of content in SL.
34Jun 27, 2011 10:26 AMnot familiar enough with it's new features to answer this.
35Jun 27, 2011 9:42 AMOther people can see you when you are on-line, even though you have blocked them from seeing you.
36Jun 27, 2011 9:00 AMv2 UI
37Jun 27, 2011 8:38 AMNeedless checks that do nothing but hinder framerate. Anything that operates off of nonstandard information that updates once a frame.
38Jun 27, 2011 8:16 AMJust a comment. I'm really enjoying using Firestorm. It has inherited the more user friendly UI from SL Viewer 2, but with the wider feature set of Phoenix. I found Phoenix very difficult to navigate after using SL V2. Well done and keep up the great work. Firestorm will be my viewer of choice.
39Jun 27, 2011 7:46 AMprivacy penetration items
40Jun 27, 2011 6:42 AMup to you
41Jun 27, 2011 6:18 AMPlease do not take our privacy away. Sometimes you just don't want to be found and if you take that away people aren't going to have fun. Thanks
42Jun 27, 2011 1:33 AMviewer 2
43Jun 26, 2011 11:16 PMmake it so it doesnt look like V2 i dont use V2 cause the color contrasts and boxed in manner gives me migraines and i know it gives some people anything from motion sickness to migraines as well ... main reason alot of us dont use V2 to begin with
44Jun 26, 2011 9:00 PMInternet profiles
45Jun 26, 2011 7:49 PMHmmm, not sure.
46Jun 26, 2011 6:54 PMHaven't used Firestorm yet.
47Jun 26, 2011 6:47 PMKeep people's privacy safe, and keep firestorm features from being glitchy for other viewers looking at your character (like how phoenix extra attatchment points would look like an arm coming out of your stomach on another viewer back before the multiple attatchment points were released)
48Jun 26, 2011 6:02 PMThe pie and other veiwer 1 interface items.
49Jun 26, 2011 5:51 PMThe advanced graphic features until they work. I cannot run them on one client on a i7/460M/8gb DD3 above 10fps. They are broken.
50Jun 26, 2011 5:46 PMnone!!!
51Jun 26, 2011 4:58 PMnone
52Jun 26, 2011 4:30 PMSeek to create a better SL product minus the options of exploiting other users' status online.
53Jun 26, 2011 4:30 PMNothing I can think of at the moment.
54Jun 26, 2011 3:12 PManything related to social networking like federate out to Facebook or Twitter
55Jun 26, 2011 2:58 PMShowing where people are looking is not even accurate and is used for lots of drama.
56Jun 26, 2011 12:04 PMnothing ... that's what makes the phoenix viewers so much better then any thing the lindens could think of ...
57Jun 26, 2011 11:53 AMNever used the IRC chat, wouldn't miss it.
58Jun 26, 2011 11:02 AMdont take anything out
59Jun 26, 2011 10:50 AMplace all the darn buttons,shortcuts back were they belong
60Jun 26, 2011 10:48 AMalways keep a way to get to avatar profiles without having to go through SL web search
61Jun 26, 2011 9:42 AMJust keep the ideas coming! Love it so far!
62Jun 26, 2011 8:48 AMAll features are welcome, as long as there is a relatively easy path to disable things that are, by personal preference, unnecessary or unwanted, or just inconvenient. For example, I often disable double-click teleport while playing some games (like greedy) to avoid getting booted from the game by accident if I cam up to a platform at 300m.
63Jun 26, 2011 8:33 AMDon't use half of the stuff now. Except building tools.
64Jun 26, 2011 7:56 AMbring back(add an option for) the old chat and IM style/placement, the look of the new chat and IMs are hard for me and a few other people I know to follow/see
65Jun 26, 2011 7:33 AMI like all of the current features that the Phoenix Viewer has.
66Jun 26, 2011 6:38 AMThe media filter is more annoying than it is useful.
67Jun 26, 2011 5:35 AMIt is very much like the newer SL viewer. I still prefer the old look and interaction of Phoenix for building and would like the have the option of either appearance on the screen. Especially do not like the zoom camera box with a iMac mouse.
68Jun 26, 2011 4:27 AManything that makes it hard for land owners or basic privacy issues.
69Jun 26, 2011 4:23 AMdont leave it out, make it optional
70Jun 26, 2011 3:01 AMAvatar rendering costs, it is not good for other users to abuse some who choose a higher rendering cost
71Jun 26, 2011 2:35 AMnon that i can think of yet
72Jun 26, 2011 2:21 AMget rid of sidebar, get comms back to 1.23 status
73Jun 26, 2011 1:09 AMPlease focus on the main functionality first, features like on this survey are just nice to have but not very important in my opinion.
74Jun 26, 2011 12:58 AMSee above
75Jun 26, 2011 12:37 AMI know I checked the buttons above, but it bears repeating: Please do NOT add features to show 'true online status'. Let people hide if they want to hide.
76Jun 25, 2011 11:16 PMNo restrained love whatever kinky pud squeezing tripe, SL is full of pimps and whores who suck the life out of the place. My...that was a bit nasty...still a fact.
77Jun 25, 2011 10:37 PMANYTHING THAT CLUTTERS UP THE VIEWER SCREEN! NO SIDEBARS, TOOL BARS ON THE TOP OR BOTTOM!
78Jun 25, 2011 10:22 PMDon't leave anything out. It'd be better to be able to just switch them on and off, when needed.
79Jun 25, 2011 10:18 PMmmm Can I have v1 profiles back!?
80Jun 25, 2011 10:12 PMthe new user guide and settings
81Jun 25, 2011 9:53 PMIRC its useless IMO
82Jun 25, 2011 7:20 PMall of the ones that do not allow people to hide online status or to turn of who can and can not see them thats just a bad bad idea
83Jun 25, 2011 6:59 PMOther than the privacy invasion stuff , everything else is fine.
84Jun 25, 2011 5:44 PMleave nothing out if its in phoenix add it to firestorm, its why your the number 1 viewer, people like the features.
85Jun 25, 2011 5:36 PMNothing springs to mind
86Jun 25, 2011 5:24 PMAnything that circumvents someone else's right to privacy. I have no problem with your stalking features, as long as a person can opt out from being seen by those they wish to not be seen by.
87Jun 25, 2011 4:54 PMi love all the features that phonix has that why i have choose to use it for many years so plz dont leave out any features out!
88Jun 25, 2011 4:22 PMhavnt used it quiet enought to decide right now Im not liking all the redundancy's
89Jun 25, 2011 4:05 PMDon't leave anything out. Put it all in there....
90Jun 25, 2011 3:44 PMPlease please PLEASE remove the "Send system information" in IM windows, or at least move it. Also, when clicking on someone's IM window, automatically place the cursor in the chat box. Please!
91Jun 25, 2011 3:38 PMLag.
92Jun 25, 2011 3:31 PMnothing. load it on... but keep the operating temperature down!! Maybe I need water cooling.....
93Jun 25, 2011 2:48 PMHow about a feature that leave you asshole 'creators' out of SL? That would be cool.
94Jun 25, 2011 2:41 PMthe sidebar.... that thing is terrible. Give us back our inventory box
95Jun 25, 2011 2:37 PMAny buggy feature until it can get properly fixed.
96Jun 25, 2011 2:17 PMCrashing; Lag, ok I know that's not possible but, it's far less frequent than any other viewer so I'd say Thanks for doing a great job with Firestorm.
97Jun 25, 2011 12:57 PM20000 skins
98Jun 25, 2011 12:05 PMdouble attachment points. (redundant)
99Jun 25, 2011 11:35 AMExplain the features better through tutorials.
100Jun 25, 2011 11:25 AManything V2 ...stick to V1 layout and less pop up notice stuff
101Jun 25, 2011 11:06 AM1: Show Look-at. I don't care who's camming me, but i don't want them to know when i'm camming them.
102Jun 25, 2011 10:42 AMYou seemed to have covered the basics already with those 5 items.
103Jun 25, 2011 10:34 AMI like all the features in Phoenix Viewer, cannot think of any that I would want left out.
104Jun 25, 2011 9:58 AMnot sure.
105Jun 25, 2011 9:18 AMWebprofiles
106Jun 25, 2011 9:10 AMThe Viewer 2 Interface -- it's a piece of shit, really.
107Jun 25, 2011 8:58 AMtake a way the sidepanel?
108Jun 25, 2011 8:02 AMIRC
109Jun 25, 2011 7:25 AMScript count >.> .... Okay, okay, I actually do see positives to having script count =) ... But, I do not like how it's become a total witch hunt to find the "script abusers". ~ I would say, "Not too important, but please don't add it"
110Jun 25, 2011 7:15 AMI can't think of any.
111Jun 25, 2011 6:29 AMI don't much care for the radar it seems like snooping to me, but i guess a lot of people do like it.
112Jun 25, 2011 6:07 AMphysics layer
113Jun 25, 2011 6:06 AMCan never have too many features :)
114Jun 25, 2011 4:14 AMReview chat and im and chat options to reduce the over complex choice. This would assist in reducing mouse clicks for so many confirmations
115Jun 25, 2011 2:30 AMsidebar
116Jun 25, 2011 12:41 AMget rid of "Reset Default Male/Female Avater" under Avatar->Avatar Health...way too easy to hit by mistake
117Jun 24, 2011 11:45 PMexcept for the above. or at least a modified version.
118Jun 24, 2011 10:24 PMAnything that violates the 'privacy' of the users should not be present in Firestorm. Erring on the side of the user's privacy is better than the alternative.
119Jun 24, 2011 10:07 PMAny other online anti-privacy "features" you dream up.
120Jun 24, 2011 10:06 PMSide bars.
121Jun 24, 2011 9:41 PMThe colors are confusing because they are not consistent.
122Jun 24, 2011 8:30 PMgestures
123Jun 24, 2011 8:20 PMLeave out the option to "hide show look-at beacon". Either everyone should have the ability to see whats being looked at, or no one should. If users have the ability to hide their beacons, then there is no point in having the 'show-look-at' option in the first place.
124Jun 24, 2011 8:05 PMHavent thought of any
125Jun 24, 2011 7:36 PMnone
126Jun 24, 2011 7:31 PMplease don't leave stuff out. the point of a TPV is to give us more features than the 'official' v2 viewer can't or won't.
127Jun 24, 2011 7:21 PMGenerally speaking features that can be used to circumvent someone else's rights, or plainly put those that could and most likely would be used to bypass having to respect your fellow man.
128Jun 24, 2011 7:03 PMNot sure yet
129Jun 24, 2011 6:48 PMthe new breast physics,, its another thing to wear,,, put the old one back in,, leave the phoenix the way it is, V2 is hard to use
130Jun 24, 2011 6:10 PMGestures. Gods I hate gestures. But seriously, I cant think of anything just yet on this either.
131Jun 24, 2011 5:54 PMNeeds to be a better alert system for incoming messages and inventory items handed to you. I have missed so many IMs that I didn't even realize had been sent to me that I am reluctant to use Firestorm.
132Jun 24, 2011 5:12 PMAny and all of the features that subvert or workaround other users privacy settings.
133Jun 24, 2011 5:07 PMPlease leave out any features that affect the privacy settings by making them visible to others.
134Jun 24, 2011 4:50 PMLeave out user interface things that work like Viewer 2. Thanks for doing this!
135Jun 24, 2011 4:48 PMI dont see anything that needs dropped.
136Jun 24, 2011 4:39 PMget rid of that sidebar!! I came to use phoenix because I hate the viewer 2 set up. Why do you insist on putting it into the firestorm viewer??? If it is included in the final release, I will not use firestorm!
137Jun 24, 2011 4:35 PMso far likes everything else.
138Jun 24, 2011 4:06 PMI've also heard mentions this week of a possible profile rating system being added? The best thing LL ever did was get rid of that pathetic popularity contest.
139Jun 24, 2011 3:00 PMGet rid of the "People" window - it's redundant. Have the "People" button open the "Conversations" window. Move the Radar info panel to it's own "Radar" button.
140Jun 24, 2011 2:23 PMIf it would make loading faster, you could make the RLV support an optional download. I honestly don't pay attention to what I do not use.
141Jun 24, 2011 1:21 PMMake it like emergence and phoenix used to be. It is such a huge help to have a client like that. I really like it when moderating a sim. The Lindens have no clue they just work there they do not use secondlife that is why their client suxs so bad. Make it like phoenix and more...thank you for all your hard work.
142Jun 24, 2011 1:11 PMDockbar. Not really need that. i am always try to float it.
143Jun 24, 2011 12:57 PMNothing I can see to take away from it.
144Jun 24, 2011 10:04 AM'sticky' derender like Phoenix has, maybe I need to try blocking an item an it already has the feature.
145Jun 24, 2011 9:25 AMinfo about someone taking snapshots
146Jun 24, 2011 8:33 AMBuilt in AO
147Jun 24, 2011 8:27 AMkeep the phoneix look its good and were all used to it NOT the dang SL viewer 2 crappy look
148Jun 24, 2011 8:05 AMthe press enter to type crap.
149Jun 24, 2011 7:45 AMif i had to pick one.. show when a friend has blocked your ability to see them online
150Jun 24, 2011 7:34 AMA viewer that requires I have to keep an extra 1500 items of useless inventory ( the inventory Library ) is a joke. Having a bridge that as a coder I have to write new lines into just to even work properly .Tells me that the quality control never under went a proper due diligence and was rushed . Overall it feels like Firestorm is more concerned with pandering to the masses who use Phoenix and seem afraid to come to terms accepting that Viewer two is the future of Second Life . If I wish to use a Viewer two viewer that has a Viewer one feel to it and deliver's with Mesh . My options are Kirsten's viewer ( no rlv a slight deal breaker ) . Or using one of the following viewers with the Hitomi Stardust skin : Marine's rlv viewer 2 . Dolphin II Catznip or the default Linden Labs Viewer ( again no RLV ) . All of those viewers currently offer full mesh support , and the ability to remove inventory . and Shock a working radar range identical to firestorm without needing a bridge which presently seems to be more of a broken piece of junk that has more holes an errors then a fresh slab of swiss cheese . I've also found all of the other viewer 2 , third party viewers to provide a higher degree of both stability . And a much higher frame rate then Firestorm provides . On average I can have 15 - 18 more frames per second using Marine's RLV over firestorm . This so called KDU advantage by firestorm does not appear any adavantage . Also I have found Firestorm to completly be unable to properly display textures . Yet all other third party an even the default Linden Labs V2 viewers all have 0 problems displaying textures while using identical settings . the only reason to even bother with Firestorm at the present is the better use of the chat windows an IM windows being a much nicer layout over the other viewer 2 viewers .
151Jun 24, 2011 7:01 AMAutomatic saving of user ID in log in - bad security. Phoenix didnt do it.
152Jun 24, 2011 5:14 AMAll this viewer 2 UI stuff Smaller borders around the windows and so.. The UI and the profiles looking as in phoenix
153Jun 24, 2011 3:45 AMCan't think of any other than what's been mentioned.
154Jun 24, 2011 1:25 AMpeople I dont like, lmao
155Jun 24, 2011 1:05 AMLeave nothing out
156Jun 24, 2011 12:11 AMpress esc to return to world view in mouseview
157Jun 23, 2011 11:11 PMMake the interface exactly like Phoenix and not SL v2 cuz that sux.
158Jun 23, 2011 10:11 PMn/a
159Jun 23, 2011 9:37 PMShowing when friendship is disolved.
160Jun 23, 2011 7:57 PMthe all in one search. I like to preselect people/groups/events/stores when I search as it exists in Phoenix now.
161Jun 23, 2011 6:34 PManything that limits privacy if someone wants to be private. Communication is a good thing, except when its not.
162Jun 23, 2011 6:25 PMCan't think of any.
163Jun 23, 2011 5:50 PMGet rid of the annoying little red arrow that appears when TP'ing using the Map. Get rid of the useless message saying the a sim is using a different version.
164Jun 23, 2011 5:42 PMNothing. I want to keep everything Phoenix has. If you don't, I'll stay with Phoenix for as long as I can and move to any other similar client if necessary.
165Jun 23, 2011 4:53 PMNothing is springing to mind, I am sad to say. If this changes, I'll let you know. Thanks for all your hard work, because without Firestorm, if all I had to use was LL's V2, I think I'd just stop using Second Life outright.
166Jun 23, 2011 4:52 PMspellcheck - not important in a chat's world
167Jun 23, 2011 4:50 PMreally the fly one is the one i want gone and i will continue to push linden labs to block viewers that allow it
168Jun 23, 2011 3:38 PMall Features that could harm your Privacy
169Jun 23, 2011 3:32 PMwhy leave anything out?
170Jun 23, 2011 2:26 PMNot logging teleport offers in IM logs
171Jun 23, 2011 2:11 PM"Leave Out"? Why leave anything out?! Oh, you mean from not-yet-developed-but-thinking-about features that are not part of the survey? The only thing I can think of is the "browserization" of the viewer. I don't use a 3D viewer like a web browser. Search / location bars and back-forward buttons make NO sense. I liked it better when SL didn't have teleports except at the hubs. There's something lost in just poofing from place to place. Sure it speeds up getting from place to place, but often, the journey is more fun and memorable than the destination. It would also create better shopping economics, where shops can line thoroughfares rather than exist anywhere at the whim of the search engine...
172Jun 23, 2011 2:07 PMhaven't seen anything I don't like yet :D
173Jun 23, 2011 1:57 PMlag
174Jun 23, 2011 1:28 PM-
175Jun 23, 2011 12:46 PMI can't think of any.
176Jun 23, 2011 12:30 PManything that undermines privacy 0 yes - I am now paranoid - with reason!
177Jun 23, 2011 11:28 AMI perfer to have the friends inventory and land mark tabs along the right all in one box the way they are in V2...I use the bottom bar where they are in firestorm for my open IM and group chats.
178Jun 23, 2011 11:20 AMDon't mess around with the KDU, now that you guys finally got the chance to reintroduce it. Thanks for that!
179Jun 23, 2011 11:01 AMleave out view indicators
180Jun 23, 2011 10:56 AMThe Client 2 interface (dashboard, IM and chat-handling, icon overload, crowding of one window with functionality, etc)
181Jun 23, 2011 10:46 AMNo suggestion
182Jun 23, 2011 10:23 AMnone, more the better for me :)
183Jun 23, 2011 10:02 AMAnything that makes it lag like Phoenix was :D
184Jun 23, 2011 9:48 AMNothing that I can think of...
185Jun 23, 2011 9:47 AMn/a
186Jun 23, 2011 8:30 AMDo not put the build menu right next tot he edt menu.
187Jun 23, 2011 8:01 AMNone. Fuck controversial.
188Jun 23, 2011 7:33 AMSince the lag dosnt come from the viewer, I dont think you should remove something :d ♥
189Jun 23, 2011 7:23 AMnone :)
190Jun 23, 2011 6:18 AMthere is nothing i would remove
191Jun 23, 2011 6:10 AMcan't think of anything
192Jun 23, 2011 5:59 AMAgain - Only just started using it so may not have figured out how to stop the fav landmarks showing up at the top of my screen. they use valuable viewing real estate IMO even when transparent. Same with browser type bar although there prolly a way to switch it off.
193Jun 23, 2011 5:53 AMcant think of any right now
194Jun 23, 2011 5:09 AMthe current notice and item giving announcements in group chats. I miss SO many things
195Jun 23, 2011 4:26 AMI dont really mind any of the other features i dont use, as long as they dont impact the stability or speed of the viewer.
196Jun 23, 2011 2:24 AMpeople seeing if i have them hidden or not, the ability to see me online even when i appear offline ot nonfriends is a double edge sword. i like it because i can see who really is offline and online, but it grants people who need help with customer service from my store to IM me (even though i say notecard). while i don't mind it i do mind some of the snots that DEMAND my attention right then and there.
197Jun 23, 2011 1:00 AMI only want things added :D
198Jun 23, 2011 12:50 AMMaleware, Viruses, gremlins, and resource hogs.
199Jun 23, 2011 12:46 AMThere are features that SHOULDN'T be added? If someone doesn't like it, make it togglable, I say!
200Jun 23, 2011 12:20 AMautomatic ambient polka music, which I would still pick over the 5 options above!
201Jun 22, 2011 11:13 PMNone. if it can be done and it's legal, it should be in there. It is not the place of software to rule what i should and shouldnt' be doing, only to tell me what i can and cant. Either that or fork the code, make a full tech version with every feature and a dumbass version that makes people feel (falsely) secure about stuff. Or write a clear mission statement indicating if you intend to be a "power" viewer or a "fluffy" viewer, because I migrated from V2 to emergance/phoenix/firestorm because of the power features. (and interestingly odd that you skipped the whole 'look at' beacons privacy... i know it's hidden in the default viewer too, tho without the names... )
202Jun 22, 2011 11:03 PMNot too much pop-up, messages, info stuff. really...
203Jun 22, 2011 10:27 PMadding always fly is going to get a lot of folks needlessly banned on many estes don't want newbs flying around like places like airports cause they fly into the flight paths and go afk till somebody hits them. its often automatic banning on a lot of estates. Most cases no fly was impliment to curve grievers moving to fast to get banned even with the radar its easier but still really easy to hit the wrong person. Seeing the estates the one who paid all the money for the region, it still should be the eastes right on beable to fly or not.
204Jun 22, 2011 9:30 PManything that compromises privacey
205Jun 22, 2011 8:57 PMN/A
206Jun 22, 2011 8:50 PMDunno.
207Jun 22, 2011 8:33 PMMake Joint
208Jun 22, 2011 8:13 PMLAG
209Jun 22, 2011 8:12 PMDont change around with the layout, or at least have an option for 'classic' style. The V2 SL version viewers drive a lot of us crazy and would be lost if the lay outs changed to much.
210Jun 22, 2011 8:08 PMnone that I can think of atm.
211Jun 22, 2011 7:16 PM- everything that overrules privacy settings - everything that costs stability
212Jun 22, 2011 6:23 PMFuture user interface pessimization, where possible.
213Jun 22, 2011 5:03 PM.
214Jun 22, 2011 5:01 PMnone
215Jun 22, 2011 3:27 PMAny feature that does nothing but feed into people's drama and shytestorms.
216Jun 22, 2011 3:06 PMI think everyone has different needs and if people don't like something, don't use it so keep it all in.
217Jun 22, 2011 3:03 PMHaven't used it enough to tell yet, other than it tends to load background memory a great deal.
218Jun 22, 2011 2:55 PMI am a bit concerned about the cookies it is loading
219Jun 22, 2011 2:50 PMAt this point you need to add all the features that are in phoenix, in my opinion. I hate viewer 2 to death, but you guys are doing great with firestorm!
220Jun 22, 2011 2:40 PMI can't really think of a lot I would really say leave out, if I don't want to use it I just disable it. As long as it doesn't create performance or lag issues trick it out as much you want lol. I do hate the V2 interface though, but I understand there isn't much you can do about that.
221Jun 22, 2011 2:29 PMi can't think of one right now.
222Jun 22, 2011 2:07 PMyou guys are awesome! thanks for all the great work you do!
223Jun 22, 2011 1:50 PMLSL bridge. I hate it.
224Jun 22, 2011 1:47 PMNone... I'd love to see all the features of phoenix in firestorm if possible.
225Jun 22, 2011 1:43 PMThe weird sideways menu that is trying to be like phoenix but fails horribly., For the chat box. Oh phoenix it's the other way round and the names are on the bottom not wasting space.. Please fix it.
226Jun 22, 2011 1:39 PMI think you should keep what you have ad move forward. Why remove things just because some want them removed. Have those features set true or false in the debug menu.
227Jun 22, 2011 1:39 PMnothing leave out of, but make it possible to chose for each user him/herself what they want activated at least or not
228Jun 22, 2011 1:38 PMI would have said bouncy breasts but sadly that has gone mainstream now for some reason. Never add the ability to zoom in on profile and/or RL pictures.
229Jun 22, 2011 1:18 PManything which deliberately breaks landowners specific wishes.
230Jun 22, 2011 12:48 PMjiggly--- eh, as long as it's turn-offable; fine. :P
231Jun 22, 2011 12:36 PMnot that I'm aware of..
232Jun 22, 2011 12:20 PMMost viewer two stuff like not being able to find most stuff haha. And where you see camera views, i want to be able to see them all the time, I don't want to have to keep clicking a button to have the camera views, fly and other things in that area to pop up.
233Jun 22, 2011 11:34 AMVersion 2 Tabs, chat popups,
234Jun 22, 2011 11:31 AMDon't leave out but make them by choice selectable
235Jun 22, 2011 11:24 AMnothing.
236Jun 22, 2011 11:21 AMAnything considered a novelty really, the main features i use and would like kept are area search, some form of radar and the little menu bottom right of phoenix where the bandwidth. DD, LOD etc are.
237Jun 22, 2011 11:16 AMAnything else that leaks private or blocked personal information, or takes advantage of such leaks.
238Jun 22, 2011 11:11 AMAnything that exhibits stalker tendencies should be left out.
239Jun 22, 2011 11:07 AMtranslating from intern Message
240Jun 22, 2011 10:39 AMThose little icons that pop up on the bottom right as notifications of incoming group chat and IM's. They're just clumsy mystery meat which causes me at least 5 clicks per message to figure out what click is going to do what. Once that's done, if I clicked the wrong X, I have to click another 10 or 20 things to re-open a group chat or IM window to reply to someone. Viewer 2 sucks. I'm glad you're turning it into something usable.
241Jun 22, 2011 10:38 AMSidebar
242Jun 22, 2011 10:16 AMChange the bridge so that it either doesn't litter prims, or is able to be *easily* found by land-owners and deleted when not in use.
243Jun 22, 2011 10:11 AMnone
244Jun 22, 2011 9:38 AMThere area allot of features missing in Firestorm.. I wont be switching permanently any time soon from Phoenix until 99% of the features are available. Firestorm (to me) is a huge step backwards. I agree it is stable ....but it reminds me too much of Linden's viewer at present and if you ask a die hard Phoenix user will the switch .. the will say no!
245Jun 22, 2011 9:22 AMPlease protect peoples wishes and privacy by leaving the integrity of offline mode and hidden status as effective features of a viewer. Failure to respect these features will result in a loss of viewer usesr, myself included.
246Jun 22, 2011 8:45 AMI loved most of what Phoenix had to offer. I wouldn't be able to suggest any omissions. If I wanted broken and stripped down, I'd be using the LL viewer, after all!
247Jun 22, 2011 8:15 AMI can't really think of any to leave out. It's best to keep adding from the old viewer, but I also think it'd be best to work more on the base client before adding fancy new stuff.
248Jun 22, 2011 8:09 AMWeb Profiles, Web Search
249Jun 22, 2011 7:52 AMability to cam past say 500m
250Jun 22, 2011 7:46 AMNothing that is perfect viewer
251Jun 22, 2011 7:38 AMAny that breaks SL's TOS on privacy.
252Jun 22, 2011 7:28 AMThe 2.0 building tools. Totally awkward. Also that stupid menu thing... keep the pieeees.
253Jun 22, 2011 7:22 AMRadar; it's a waste of bandwidth and SL cycles.
254Jun 22, 2011 7:16 AMi think if its in Phoenix it should be in Firestorm thats why people use Phoenix. Those few who dont like their online status being shown or seeing how you have friends set have something to hide, I dont care if anyone knows my status, or how I have them set if they dont like how I have them set they can ask me and if they dont like the answer there is always the mute button, also some people clean out their friends list from time to time and its nice to see that warning so you can talk to that person and see if you did something wrong, or if it was just spring cleaning.
255Jun 22, 2011 6:47 AMSeeing what Rights (find on map, etc) another has given you. As useful as it is, it only leads to Drama
256Jun 22, 2011 6:38 AMNone
257Jun 22, 2011 6:31 AMDon't leave any out....I believe adults play sl....they should be able to act like adults and decide whether to turn on or off features or even to choose not to use them
258Jun 22, 2011 6:25 AMAnything that invades someones privacy.
259Jun 22, 2011 6:20 AMErm, the whole dappy 'Message' crapoodle thing in the bottom right corner. Too easy to miss. Any menu called 'Me' or similar twee nonsense, but thats a general gripe haha, ditto anything called dashboard - as a biker the metaphor is as useful as an ashtray on a handlebar...
260Jun 22, 2011 6:06 AMdon't care
261Jun 22, 2011 6:06 AMMe. I won't be using Firestorm regardless of the choices you make. Not interested in subscribing to this bizarre culture of geek-control.
262Jun 22, 2011 5:57 AMNone :)
263Jun 22, 2011 5:57 AMNone.
264Jun 22, 2011 5:43 AMagain, I need to compare the interfaces
265Jun 22, 2011 5:01 AMI think virtually any feature is nice in FS as long as it is implemented within the rights/abilities of the user and recipient to control. I think I would like to see all of Phoenix in Firestorm, along with more powerful RLV controls and options.
266Jun 22, 2011 4:49 AMyou should be able to set it up with all options, or non at all, for less lag. Options are great, but seems to feel bloated and laggy when it's all on. So an easy all on, and all off, for those laggy parties or shopping.
267Jun 22, 2011 4:48 AMI fail to see the point in OTR encryption. I never used it in Phoenix and it seems that only people who've something to hide ever use it. I usually refuse to interact with those who see it as an absolute necessity.
268Jun 22, 2011 4:47 AMNone, all the features currently included on Firestorm are great!
269Jun 22, 2011 4:45 AMThe sidebar? hahahaha jk ;p nuuuu, just bring in allll the goodies that got us all so addicted and dependant from Emerald and later Phoenix! Thanks so much for making the experience of and in SL so much easier and richer! Go on with your wonderful work guys <3
270Jun 22, 2011 4:19 AMNone. Give the choice to the users. At most, turn things off by default and add them under the advanced menu.
271Jun 22, 2011 4:08 AMSpyware and custom login screens that misuse the userbase as hacker tools.
272Jun 22, 2011 3:37 AMRemove or Desaturate The Firestorm logo that appears very small at side when Secondlife is making an announcement in local chat. Makes for to many red dots in local chat that way, gives a very cluttered feel.
273Jun 22, 2011 3:24 AMToasts and the tiny, easy-to-miss notifications in the lower right.
274Jun 22, 2011 3:19 AMPlease allow the option for chat to be seen as it was, with name on the left followed by the text rather than in separate boxes. The new method causes text to scroll too fast.
275Jun 22, 2011 3:09 AMI like the other features also
276Jun 22, 2011 3:04 AMjiggles waste of time and just physics an
277Jun 22, 2011 3:01 AMNone of which I'm aware at this time.
278Jun 22, 2011 2:36 AMALL the "look at avie" type features! Just silliness.
279Jun 22, 2011 2:30 AMRemove the copybot functions. I know they are limited to stuff you created. But with very lil changes the limit can be removed.
280Jun 22, 2011 2:27 AMnone!
281Jun 22, 2011 2:07 AMAnything else that breaches privacy settings. Please, no spy tools. You wanna do that, you'll end like Emerald did.
282Jun 22, 2011 2:02 AMDitto answer #2. Thank you all for everything you do.
283Jun 22, 2011 1:40 AMNothing that I can think of right off-paw.
284Jun 22, 2011 1:30 AMIndependent contacts/groups window from v1, unless it can be detached and even completely hidden.
285Jun 22, 2011 1:22 AMI would prefer it if people could not render an avatar as a particle cloud on demand by muting them. Firstly the old grey muted avatar made it easier to identify someone that has been muted without confusing them with someone that is still rezzing. Also the ability to render someone as a particle cloud whenever they like will take away the skill factor involved in SL combat because people won't need to worry about distracting animations... they would just need to aim for the particle cloud/egg which is exactly where they should be aiming at during combat which many people would regard as cheating and will ruin combat. Maybe muted avatars could be 100% derendered instead including the name tag.
286Jun 22, 2011 1:08 AMSimple, anything that gives Firestorm users an advantage over sim settings and therefore encouraging cheaters especially in Combat based Sims.
287Jun 22, 2011 12:52 AMnada
288Jun 22, 2011 12:22 AMThe TP to feature is GREAT, but.... I think when you request to TP to a person it should pop up a permission request. Because sometimes strangers use this and drop into your house or in the middle of a 'intimate' moment. So maybe that should be on the requested feature Add list instead.
289Jun 21, 2011 11:26 PMIt is just like viewer 2 it sucks and I will not be using it if it stays as it is. I loved the old Phoenix this is just a rehash of viewer 2
290Jun 21, 2011 10:52 PMnone I can think of off hand.
291Jun 21, 2011 10:29 PMweb based profiles.
292Jun 21, 2011 10:15 PMAny linking to Facebook, Twitter or any other "Social" advantages. I hate that my profile can be linked to those sites and I don't care for those features. If it has to be in it, make it an option to enable instead of having to disable it. Any other "features" such as those should be enable only. You should have the choice to turn them on. Not be forced to turn them off once you hear they are on.
293Jun 21, 2011 10:10 PMnone
294Jun 21, 2011 9:51 PMNone. The more features the better.
295Jun 21, 2011 9:43 PMLeave IRC chat out....
296Jun 21, 2011 9:42 PMNothing, you all have done great with the beta so far!
297Jun 21, 2011 9:30 PMauto accepting inventory is no good
298Jun 21, 2011 9:28 PMThere should be an option not to show your name on the title bar.
299Jun 21, 2011 9:27 PMi guess i can't really think of any features you have added to phoenix that i didn't like, some i might not have used, but i like the idea that it's feature rich enough there's something for everyone, that's why it's such a popular viewer, i can understand the controversy on those few though it didn't make much difference to me personally
300Jun 21, 2011 8:51 PMI can't think of any at the moment. I really really hate the friend dissolving notification--even more so now that I'm stuck with a needy, obsessive "friend" who NEVER logs off.
301Jun 21, 2011 8:37 PMAbility to keep people from seeing where your cam is? Their cam shouldn't be anywhere not supposed to be so they shouldn't have to hide it unless I have reason to know where it is. Same case there pointless to have something for security if it can be bypassed.
302Jun 21, 2011 8:35 PMNothing.
303Jun 21, 2011 8:25 PMThe more choices the better, as long as we can customize!
304Jun 21, 2011 7:46 PMPlease stop leaving things out. If someone wanted it in the first place, there must be many more people that also want it.
305Jun 21, 2011 7:36 PMMedia stream locking.
306Jun 21, 2011 7:36 PMI know that you are proud of your built in AO but I use an advance ao v.3 or 4 and it gives me every thing from dance to being able to move my arms independently so my stands wont look like they are just looped and it gives me facial emotes in order to use your AOI would have to use up 2 to 3 different attachment point.
307Jun 21, 2011 7:12 PMThe separate outfits folder is ridiculous, but you might not have any choice in that...
308Jun 21, 2011 7:05 PMNothing I can think of at this moment
309Jun 21, 2011 7:02 PMBasic mode.
310Jun 21, 2011 6:59 PMweb profiles
311Jun 21, 2011 6:46 PMV2 style avatar physics,,, the older physics you had was far better
312Jun 21, 2011 6:45 PMI don't know
313Jun 21, 2011 6:41 PMNone
314Jun 21, 2011 6:35 PMCan't think of anything to leave out..
315Jun 21, 2011 6:34 PMPlease do not give users the powers to override the settings of others in respect to privacy and land issues. Just because you "can" doesnt mean you "should.
316Jun 21, 2011 6:29 PMWell I've been afraid to try it because I hate Viewer 2 so much. I can't stand how the menus are laid out in SL Viewer 2. I'll check out Firestorm to see if they are that awful, and if they're not I'll give it a try. I've had troubles switching viewers because of preferences, and where the different caches and chat logs move to. That drives me crazy.
317Jun 21, 2011 5:52 PMthe side-bar seeing people's rl info at the front of their profiles
318Jun 21, 2011 5:23 PMAnything infringing on privacy.
319Jun 21, 2011 5:19 PMCan't think of any. In fact, i believe that if any PV features are left out whilst it's technically possible or easy to implement, there will be people that sorely miss it.
320Jun 21, 2011 5:05 PMNone that I know of
321Jun 21, 2011 5:02 PMNo preferences here
322Jun 21, 2011 5:00 PMThat rigthhand sidebar thing. Make it as much like Phoenix as possible. Most of us HATE the V2 look.
323Jun 21, 2011 4:49 PMthe timedisplay can be trown out. its useles since every desktop has a timedisplay already.
324Jun 21, 2011 4:46 PMNothing that i can think of at the momment
325Jun 21, 2011 4:33 PMnone
326Jun 21, 2011 4:33 PMthere are no features that should be left out of Firestorm, the more it has the better the viewer.
327Jun 21, 2011 4:17 PMPhoenix viewer is perfection- I cannot think of anything to get rid of great work and ty for all you do. The real reason i love phoenix is that literally everything is a choice! on or off, like it or hate it- we get to decide. Boobs on/off, song titles on/off...etc. Dont care what the defaut is as long as I can opt out if i choose as often as I like.
328Jun 21, 2011 3:57 PMhonestly, none. what made Phoenix and it's predecessor great was that it had tools for everyone, to use at will.
329Jun 21, 2011 3:46 PMweb profiles, that's not controversial
330Jun 21, 2011 3:40 PMNothing
331Jun 21, 2011 3:29 PMThe ability to derez a prim on another persons avatar. I wear a skirt to cover myself up, not to be perved by others.
332Jun 21, 2011 3:27 PMThis is a wide open field. I think the list of features in this poll cover the major ones.
333Jun 21, 2011 3:25 PMIRC
334Jun 21, 2011 3:19 PManything that violates people's privacy
335Jun 21, 2011 3:14 PMCan't think of anything.
336Jun 21, 2011 3:13 PM1. Radar. It gives up too much information about others, and I personally have only used it 2 or 3 times myself (to see what the fuss is about) and as paranoid or frightened and anti-social as I may be, I see NO point in it. It's mostly for control freaks, and people on power trips, like ** ******** and as a woman, I've found that it's come in very handy for assholes with their freenises out stalking me to fuck when I'm just shopping! Radar is evil, but if it's not including and that stunts further development, I'm willing to live with it's constant abuse and then see if there's a limit on how long my MUTE and Derender lists can get! :-) Also, I do respect a parcel / Sim owners right to knowing who's on their land, sooo, all is good, I guess. Radar is just not my thing, and I don't get it. I don't even open the mini-map unless I'm very lost. 2. Enforce Cam restraints on land that has this "fantasy feature" enabled (another LL add-on). I've been perved and stalked while carrying on my personal sexual freaks 3800 meters up. That's no-ones business. I know this is a huge wish & PLEASE thing, But how about about 'total cam freedom' on your parcels only? ...or granted by friends or groups? At least make it nearly impossible to disable all camera restraints in deeply buried, password protected sub-sub-sub menus? And when turned on you loose some other ability, like... uhmmm... Radar? Or at least require a painful rectal exam?
337Jun 21, 2011 3:06 PMAdd features. Do not eliminate features.
338Jun 21, 2011 3:02 PMIdk if this was due to teh beta version, but my computer seems to work fine with latest phoenix ver. and since I tried firestorm it gave me some "stuck screens" as in freezing images etc, not low fps but high cpu and hdd work. But maybe it's time to get a new puter xD
339Jun 21, 2011 3:02 PMDO not have it work like SL viewer does I cant even go on it for more then 10 mins all the confussion of windows and unable to get rid of all th egroup chatter and stuff if your in a lot of groups that post..is I have add and OCD its makes a game that relaxes me make me want to slam the computer off the desk lol SO please please dont have it like sl's I wont log on at all if I cant have your viwer. I was scared to death when emerald went out I hav ebeen on sl a lot of years and sl viwer is the only BAD thing I can say about sl.
340Jun 21, 2011 3:00 PMnone
341Jun 21, 2011 2:58 PMViewer identification the mob mentality it generates in more than a few is pandering to childish behaviour
342Jun 21, 2011 2:58 PMAt times, I'd like to be able to click on my Avatar and drag the mouse and they start walking... But also have the ability to turn it off easily without going through the Preferences when I don't want to use the feature
343Jun 21, 2011 2:57 PMLeave nothing out, but every added feature should be able to be dis-abled.
344Jun 21, 2011 2:54 PMRemove the green waves when in a private call from local this is stupid and should be removed how else would i know if i am talking in public or in private please please please remove them waves from in local on the little box in the bottom tray is great but not in local i can not stand it worst feature i ever seen!
345Jun 21, 2011 2:42 PMNone that I can think of right at the moment.
346Jun 21, 2011 2:41 PMMe thinks its annoying when searching through my messy inventory, that it resets/reloads every time a friend logs in. I scream i do
347Jun 21, 2011 2:40 PMside bar
348Jun 21, 2011 2:36 PMKDU: it makes it impossible to review the viewer code
349Jun 21, 2011 2:18 PMTurn off the beep on every line of chat! I don't know if this is currently possible (tried to find out how to get rid of it). This is incredibly annoying at a live music event.
350Jun 21, 2011 2:16 PMNone at this time. Ive used it a few days and I love it so far except the 2 issues above. Keep up the great work.
351Jun 21, 2011 2:12 PMThere are some viewers (I don't know if Firestorm is among them, but I believe it was present in the late unlamented Emerald) that allow you to detect where another avatar's camera is. This feature should not be implemented in any viewer. I would prefer not to be spammed with a message every time someone takes a snapshot (as Phoenix does). It serves no useful purpose to know that someone somewhere on the sim took a picture of something, which is all that the message tells me.
352Jun 21, 2011 2:06 PMMesh (who needs it?)
353Jun 21, 2011 2:02 PMHotkeys. please, never ever add useless Hotkeys to it!
354Jun 21, 2011 1:55 PMGenerally I'm against anything that violates the privacy expectations of a user using the standard LL viewer. The fact that other people write code that do this doesn't mean that (a) it's the right thing to do, or that (b) LL will continue to tolerate it
355Jun 21, 2011 1:48 PMDissolved friendship notifications and showing if someone has hidden online status, too much drama!
356Jun 21, 2011 1:46 PMCan't think of any
357Jun 21, 2011 1:43 PMAnything that allows another user to over-ride what I've selected as a preference.
358Jun 21, 2011 1:41 PMWeb search, web profiles, all other slow, cluttering web based stuff
359Jun 21, 2011 1:39 PMthe v2 look!!!!!!!!!
360Jun 21, 2011 1:39 PMnone ;-))
361Jun 21, 2011 1:39 PMPhysics... what a waste of time that was, not your fault, but LL really are wasting their (correction, "our") money on developing ideas for the viewers and for the marketplace that have NO bearing on what residents and merchants want and need. Bells and whistles? We don't need them, we just need functionality, familiarity, stability and no lag.
362Jun 21, 2011 1:38 PMI'd need a list of what the options are here to know how to answer this.
363Jun 21, 2011 1:36 PMdont know yet.
364Jun 21, 2011 1:32 PMNone - even if I don't use certain features, I recognize that they are important for others.
365Jun 21, 2011 1:31 PMNone of course. Options are good, choice is good. Just make sure that anything that eats performance or screen real estate is optional.
366Jun 21, 2011 1:30 PMno preexisting or future feature should ever be removed from any viewer as long as it does not conflict with LLTOS or TPV guidelines
367Jun 21, 2011 1:27 PMMaybe a plugins architecture would allow low resources users to run a minimal Firestorm, and high resource users to fully load all features and use them.
368Jun 21, 2011 1:23 PMAs long as a feature can be turned off or ignored and doesn't invade anybody's privacy, I'm good with it. Great job! If the Lindens showed as much concern and gave such great support, 3rd party viewers wouldn't even be necessary except for the specialty options (for developers, etc). THANK YOU. Liana Halostar
369Jun 21, 2011 1:20 PMas long as the memory footprint remains reasonably small, I can't think of anything that should be automatically blacklisted from Firestrom
370Jun 21, 2011 1:19 PMN/A
371Jun 21, 2011 1:11 PMhiding your camera look at - If you can see mine, I can see yours.
372Jun 21, 2011 1:11 PMi ronno? lolol
373Jun 21, 2011 1:09 PMAs much and cool as I think it is 2 things come to mind that I see get abused the "inspect" feature is one. the other not yet but it's dangerous the ability to hit the look at cross's , We use them to see who is looking at our stuff and who is take photo's or posb. doing something they shouldn't be. Maybe amend it so yours doesn't show on your screen but others can still see it.
374Jun 21, 2011 1:08 PMthe draw distance bar at top of screen needs to be changed to the arow down to the v1 stile miny graphix bars thats all i can think of ty
375Jun 21, 2011 1:08 PMLol..whatever it is that is dragging the graphic performance down atm. Whatever it is ..it is not worth the drop.
376Jun 21, 2011 1:08 PMI see no need for vanity features like the ability to change the color of your float tag. It's wasted development time that doesn't add any extra functionality to the code.
377Jun 21, 2011 12:57 PMi think theres to much clutter along the botton with the inventory and map and stuff its to cluttered and the side pannel just doesnt work why not leave the AO and a couple of things in the menu bar
378Jun 21, 2011 12:56 PMweb profiles
379Jun 21, 2011 12:54 PMAnything that'd totally destroy backward compatibility with other viewers, make it optional. I would also not have the Home thinger there by default; true newbie residents are likely not using Firestorm (though it can happen, yeah,) and experienced residents don't need it chewing up screen real estate.
380Jun 21, 2011 12:52 PMAll the functionality that exists in Phoenix should be duplicated in Firestorm - Leave nothing out!
381Jun 21, 2011 12:50 PMNo preference.
382Jun 21, 2011 12:50 PMOne feature not on the list is being able to see who's looking at you. That's something I'd very much like NEVER to see implemented. It caused massive drama for no good reason.
383Jun 21, 2011 12:49 PMThe lookat cross-hair, it has just provided hysteria among the people that are where i work. People getting angry because someone is looking at them and create public drama that we officers can be without.
384Jun 21, 2011 12:47 PMI DO NOT want the notices to be moved back up top. If this is added please only add as an option - that would be a deal-breaker for me.
385Jun 21, 2011 12:47 PMleave nothing out
386Jun 21, 2011 12:46 PMradar button on minimap.. put it down on teh bottom like phoenix
387Jun 21, 2011 12:46 PMnone simples!
388Jun 21, 2011 12:45 PMcopybot lol
389Jun 21, 2011 12:45 PMnone, the more the better. Go all out with firestorm, and if you doubt, just add a toggle function fo the feature.
390Jun 21, 2011 12:42 PMvoice (just kidding)
391Jun 21, 2011 12:41 PMnot one :P
392Jun 21, 2011 12:41 PMdont leave out anything, heck you got all these features why take them out. if they dont like them then they dont have to use them. heck
393Jun 21, 2011 12:39 PMThe ugly LL sidebar's already been fixed with firestorm beta... ^^;
394Jun 21, 2011 12:38 PMPersonally I think the original Phoenix "avatar physics" were much better than the new v2 version. Easier to use and better effect.
395Jun 21, 2011 12:38 PMNothin I can think of.
396Jun 21, 2011 12:38 PMNEVER RLV,i die without RLV,keep RLV 4ever
397Jun 21, 2011 12:38 PMNone that i can think of.
398Jun 21, 2011 12:37 PMI would not remove what is already there, Firestorm (and phoenix) get their strength from the ability to customize things on the fly.
399Jun 21, 2011 12:35 PMNot the right field but chat distance on minimap is a friggin awesome idea. Whoever invented it - hat down.
400Jun 21, 2011 12:34 PMMake it easier liek the 1.23 and the Phoenix ,,, this si way to hard , i downloaed and promptly deleted it
401Jun 21, 2011 12:33 PMphysics
402Jun 21, 2011 12:33 PMN/a
403Jun 21, 2011 12:33 PMBeing a creator I would prefer the easier way of creating clothing that is in phoenix rather than how it is in firestorm and V2. It is much easier and is way too time consuming in firestorm & V2
404Jun 21, 2011 12:33 PMspellcheck, translation. it's very buggy and spammy.
405Jun 21, 2011 12:33 PMSidebar. :-D (Just kidding.)
406Jun 21, 2011 12:32 PMNothing springs to mind
407Jun 21, 2011 12:31 PM/
408Jun 21, 2011 12:31 PMive no idea....
409Jun 21, 2011 12:31 PMi would love the ability to select a group of things - and move them all using the xyz coordinates - so they can all move to a specific area based on the midpoint xyz
410Jun 21, 2011 12:31 PMNothing ;) Thats what makes Phoenix the best viewer, it is so feature rich.
411Jun 21, 2011 12:30 PMNone.